The Initial Teaching Alphabet (ITA), introduced in the 1960s and widely applied in the 1970s, was designed to simplify the process of learning to read and write. While this innovative method showed initial promise in developing reading skills, studies have revealed its unintended long-term impact on adult spelling abilities. This article delves into the ITA system’s principles, implementation, and the lasting consequences for learners.
What Is the Initial Teaching Alphabet?
The Initial Teaching Alphabet was an experimental phonetic system developed by Sir James Pitman. It featured 44 characters, representing the English language’s phonemes, to bridge the gap between spoken and written language. This simplified approach aimed to reduce confusion caused by irregular English spelling rules, helping children read and write faster. For example, instead of spelling “through,” ITA used a phonetic representation like “thru.”
While ITA eased the learning curve for young readers, its divergence from standard English spelling raised concerns about its effectiveness in transitioning learners to traditional orthography. Educators and researchers soon began documenting the challenges faced by students who learned under this system.

The Promise and Pitfalls of ITA
Initially, ITA was met with enthusiasm. Teachers reported faster progress in reading fluency and comprehension among students. However, as these children advanced to higher grades, the very system that was meant to help them became a hindrance. Transitioning from ITA to standard English spelling proved difficult, as learners struggled to unlearn the phonetic spellings they had internalized.
Several studies conducted during the late 70s and early 80s highlighted these challenges. For example, a report by the National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales found that ITA learners often demonstrated weaker spelling abilities compared to their peers taught using traditional methods. This discrepancy persisted into adulthood, suggesting that ITA left a lasting imprint on individuals’ cognitive processing of written language.
Long-Term Impact on Spelling Abilities
The negative effects of ITA primarily stem from its reliance on phonetic spelling, which bypassed deeper engagement with English orthographic rules. As a result, students were less equipped to navigate exceptions and complexities in standard spelling. Adults who learned under ITA often displayed difficulties in spelling words correctly, relying instead on approximations based on phonetic sounds.
For example, many former ITA learners found it challenging to spell words with silent letters, irregular patterns, or borrowed terms that defy phonetic logic. The inability to fully integrate standard spelling conventions impacted their professional and academic writing, highlighting the unintended consequences of this educational experiment.

Lessons Learned from ITA
The ITA experiment serves as a cautionary tale for educators and policymakers. While innovation in education is essential, the long-term implications of new methods must be carefully evaluated. ITA’s failure to adequately prepare students for standard spelling underscores the importance of balancing simplicity with comprehensive learning.
Today, literacy programs emphasize the integration of phonics with traditional spelling rules, ensuring students develop both reading fluency and spelling accuracy. Tools like phonics-based curriculums, supported by research-backed strategies, have replaced ITA in modern classrooms.
However, ITA’s legacy continues to spark debates about the effectiveness of experimental teaching methods. The system’s successes and shortcomings remind us that early education frameworks should prioritize adaptability, equipping learners with skills that endure beyond the classroom.
Readability guidance: Short paragraphs and lists summarize key points. Overuse of passive voice is avoided, with transitions like “however,” “for example,” and “as a result” ensuring smooth flow. Careful use of technical terms enhances clarity.